Friday, June 16, 2006

Google Reader rocks… sort of.

It’s been almost six months since I dropped Omea Reader as my primary RSS/ATOM reader for the ajaxy Google Reader. I loved Omea, but it’s just to difficult to run on a stick and I couldn’t access my feeds from other machines. I dropped it and uploaded my OPML (all 70 feeds) to Google Reader.

At the time, Reader only presented the feeds that came in after the OPML upload (which was nice). I believe that they now present a considerable amount of past posts as well – on 70 feeds, that could be a whole lotta posts.

All was well with the migration until I left town for 2 weeks and didn’t login to my Reader account – even once.

There was absolutely no way of knowing just how many posts I actually had that were unread. I anticipated that it was in the thousands.

I don’t know if you suffer from this same neurosis, but I feel unsettled when I leave applications in an unresolved state. I am a devoted follower of Zero Email Bounce principles (although I have 3 unreads in my inbox right now… I’m torn… do I finish this post, or classify them?) and like applications to close with a clean state. My wife would argue however that this need for resolution gets left at work – weird huh?

Now the real problem… Reader has NO way to mark all as read. How am I suppose to rest when 1) I don’t know how many unread messages are left or 2) I have no way of just purging them and moving on?

What a disastrous productivity sanity killer for me. I could have been doing so many other things besides that infuriating [j] wait [j] wait [j] wait [j] wait sequence on my keyboard - all without knowing when (or even if) the end would come. Shoot me please!

It psychosis was so advanced that that, a couple of weeks ago, I switched all of my feeds over to Rojo. Rojo is a wonderful reader implementation and I love the interface (esp. the mark page and mark all as read buttons). However, I was always a little uneasy that maybe all of my feeds weren’t being regularly updated. I’m probably just paranoid.

I still hadn’t given up on Rojo, but really needed my Reader fix. Enter Greasemonkey and the Google Reader Auto-Read script:

A good (but slooow) way of marking all items as read. Add’s a new link next to the “Starred” link to toggle Auto-Read on or off. Marks current item read (and moves to the next) every half-second.

Might want to run this in a background tab or when you go to sleep.

Change the “speed” variable to make it faster if you want.

Great for those testing out new aggregators who don’t want to have to constantly mark everything as read.

I can now read through Reader until I feel that the posts are getting a little old, click Start Auto-Read and open a new tab to continue on with other things. The default speed for the script was a 1500 ms between messages, but I bumped that up to 500 ms between and didn’t see any problems. I did tried 100 ms, but it skipped over most of the entries without marking them as read. Peace.

BTW – when the auto read finally finished earlier today, I had amassed a total of 3476 unread posts (not counting the ones that I had taken care of with my [j] wait sequence) since getting behind about a month ago. The weight is gone. I have closure. I have resolution. All is right again.

[Side note: I was lead to the Google Reader Auto-Read script by Jason Clark while actually trying to resurrect my Reader account with [j] wait. Thanks man, you’re better than prozac – not that I would know.]

posted on 6/16/2006 2:12:41 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [2]
  • Blog reactions
  •  Thursday, June 15, 2006

    MSN is looking for a few good men or women who can do the job that other companies probably just use screen scraping for. 

    From the above job listing page:

    Hand crafted results
    When all else fails, and the ranking algorithms do not pass the confidence threshold, we fall back to delivering handcrafted results. Working on a team of approximately 132 other handcrafters in 26 worldwide markets, you will receive a user query, use all the available search engines to quickly scour the web for results, pick the top 10 results for this query, and send it on to the user. Successful handcrafters can typically find top 10 results for a real-time user’s query in less than 3.8 seconds. This is an opportunity to truly connect with customers, because the queries that get routed to you are precisely the ones that the engine cannot answer well. We will have adequate staffing to allow generous coffee and bathroom breaks.
    If you are an expert at using at least 3 different search engines, well versed with American English/colloquial usage, and can type at > 149 words/minute as measured by the Simia-Lico method – come join us and delight users real-time!

    My assumption is (based on the job description) that they are hiring in order to end around any anti-scrape technology that Google might implement. Hmmmmm…

    What happens when the handcrafter receives a request for something illegal or immoral? The system is no longer automated – is liability transferred? If someone were to search for the latest Neil Young album and the handcrafter returned an MP3 link, does that then mean that the handcrafter gets the RIAA “fine”.?

    What is the responsibility of the handcrafter to report the IP address, MSN user name of the person who queries “how to build a dirty bomb”?

    Would you use MSN search if you knew (which you now know) that some handcrafter might see that you are searching for “hemorrhoid treatment center in or around Boone, NC”?

    I type pretty fast and am fairly efficient when Googling. However, if I had to provide the top 10 results in 3.8 seconds to ANY query, then I could do little more than copy and paste the first 10 appeared – which sounds like a screen scrape to me. It doesn’t afford time to compare results, traverse links and determine which links are the most relevant – the engine that I just exploited does all that work for me.

     We will have adequate staffing to allow generous coffee and bathroom breaks.

    I am glad that bathroom breaks are what they will have adequate staffing for. They might want to double up as many of their staff will probably require a little assistance.

     If you are an expert at using at least 3 different search engines

    Even if one of those three is actually using the other two to give the results? I foresee an infinite loop where one handcrafter’s request gets handed off to another handcrafter’s request and so on and so forth. I guess it would ultimately end when one of the handcrafters had to take that much anticipated bathroom break.

     well versed with American English/colloquial usage

    Well versed meaning: “lives in Bangalore”.

     

     

    posted on 6/15/2006 8:56:00 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [3]
  • Blog reactions
  •  Friday, June 09, 2006

    I guess that the Church of Scientology is trying to broaden their reach a little bit. Let the Days of Thunder jokes begin.

    From Sports Illustrated:

    The Church of Scientology, the religion for which actor Tom Cruise crusades, will attempt to spread its "Ignite Your Potential" message into auto racing through sponsorship of a race car in one of NASCAR's lowest levels.

    Kenton Gray, a 35-year-old Californian, will attempt to make the field for a late model race Saturday night at Irwindale (Calif.) Speedway. His No. 27 Ford Taurus will be sponsored by Bridge Publications, which publishes Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard's bestseller "Dianetics."

    The hood of the car will say "Dianetics" on it, along with a volcano to mimic the book cover.

    posted on 6/9/2006 3:54:00 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [2]
  • Blog reactions
  •  Wednesday, June 07, 2006

    Finally. Although, I am not sure what part of “NO” leaves room for “Perhaps”.

    In a hint that Google could adjust its stance in China in the future, he added: "Perhaps now the principled approach makes more sense." – Sergey Brin

    The biggest problem that I have with Google attempting to alter their stance now is that they stood so hard for their stance in the first place. Does anyone else get the feeling that it is still just about the $$?

    Speaking in Beijing at the time, Eric Schmidt, Google's chief executive, said: "We believe that the decision that we made to follow the law in China was absolutely the right one."

    It also makes me wonder why money would drive unprincipled business endeavours for a company whose core business makes billions. The Times (UK) wrote an article ripping Google’s attempts to excel outside of it’s core search business. It is evident that Google desires to expand beyond the search. They’ve got the cash to allow these infants (Gmail, Google Finance, Google News, Writely, Spreadsheet) to mature, so why do anything that would risk your integrity and consistency (not to mention the trust and respect of your base)?

    posted on 6/7/2006 1:09:34 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [0]
  • Blog reactions